3.8 C
New York
Sunday, January 19, 2025

Former Stanford Scholar Lastly Loses Defamation Swimsuit In opposition to Household Of two He Killed In Automobile Crash


Former Stanford scholar King Vanga killed Pamela and Joe Juarez in a automotive crash again in 2021. That’s an undisputed truth. When the Juarez household advised the college about the entire “killing two individuals” factor, nevertheless, Vanga sued for defamation, claiming they couldn’t name him a assassin as a result of he had solely been charged with vehicular manslaughter. Because the Stanford Each day studies, although, in an precise victory totally free speech protections, Vanga misplaced his lawsuit towards Priscilla Juarez late final month.

King Vanga, who killed Pamela and Joe Juarez together with his automotive, initially claimed a letter the Juarez household despatched Stanford was defamatory as a result of in it, they referred to as him a assassin, claimed he was underneath the affect on the time of the crash and asserted that he’d violated the Stanford Code of Conduct. Vanga denied all of these claims. The courtroom disagreed, saying the homicide and code of conduct claims had been opinions and thought of protected speech underneath the First Modification. The courtroom additionally dominated that Juarez had cause to imagine Vanga was underneath the affect on the time of the crash because it had been reported within the native information regardless of Vanga’s declare on the contrary:

On June 25, 2021, Vanga was concerned in a automotive accident in Atwater, California, which resulted within the deaths of Jose and Pamela Juarez. Vanga was charged with two counts of gross vehicular manslaughter whereas intoxicated, resisting an government officer, making an attempt to take a peace officer’s firearm and battery upon a peace officer. Vanga pleaded not responsible to those expenses.

Vanga allegedly declined a breathalyzer take a look at on the scene, in accordance with the regulation enforcement officer who responded to the accident. Nonetheless, the officer claimed that Vanga was underneath the affect. In accordance with the police report, the officer “detected a powerful odor of alcoholic beverage emitting from [Vanga’s] breath and individual and noticed his eyes had been purple.”

The media tales that circulated within the subsequent days additionally said Vanga had been underneath the affect of both medicine, alcohol or each, as per regulation enforcement studies quoted throughout the case.

This prompted Priscilla Juarez and a number of different relations to write down emails and letters to Stanford. In her e mail, she wrote she hoped the College would “take correct motion in dismissing this man as an energetic scholar of [the] morally prestigious establishment.”

In December 2021, Vanga threatened to sue Atwater police and California Freeway Patrol for alleged mistreatment and false accusation of a DUI. Vanga alleged he was punched, kicked and tased twice by responding officers. In the meantime, blood samples from the night time of the accident confirmed no presence of medication or alcohol.

Lawyer Ken “Popehat” White represented Juarez within the swimsuit, submitting an anti-SLAPP movement to have it dismissed on the grounds that the swimsuit violated his shopper’s First Modification rights. SLAPP stands for Strategic Lawsuit In opposition to Public Participation and usually refers to lawsuits filed on questionable grounds with the intent to stifle free speech. Anti-SLAPP statutes permit defendants to have these lawsuits dismissed if the movement is granted and in addition get well any lawyer’s charges.

“There’s a pattern the place wealthy individuals suppose that the poor ought to solely have as a lot free speech as they will afford. And that to me, [that’s] what this case was about, and that’s why I’m glad we now have a software just like the anti-SLAPP statute,” White advised the Each day.

Sadly for the Juarezes, Vanga additionally filed defamation fits towards different relations and people nonetheless haven’t been in entrance of a decide. However whereas nothing is assured, it seems like White believes there’s a superb likelihood they’ll see related outcomes, telling the Each day, “Each case is just a little completely different as a result of each case is predicated on what that defendant mentioned of their letter [to Stanford]. However for my part, [Priscilla Juarez’s family members] needs to be very optimistic primarily based on this end result.”

As we talked about when we first reported on this lawsuit, nobody pressured Vanga to sue the Juarez household. He may have merely let this entire factor go and targeted on getting ready for his doubtless conviction. The implications of killing two individuals aren’t often pleasant, however odds are, he most likely would have remained largely unknown exterior of the Bay Space. As a substitute, he had the audacity to sue the household of the individuals he killed together with his automotive, and in doing so, drew the eye of nationwide media. Because of this, much more individuals know King Vanga killed Pamela and Joe Juarez together with his automotive in 2021.

It isn’t clear when King Vanga’s prison trial will start, however hopefully, it doesn’t take an excessive amount of longer. He deserves to face the results for what he did, whether or not he was underneath the affect on the time of the crash or not.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles